Effects of dietary protein restriction on growth performance, nutrition, body composition, and activity of some digestive enzymes in red tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus × Oreochromis niloticus)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Natural Resources, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology, Khorramshahr, Khuzestan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The primary operational cost in aquaculture is attributed to feed expenses, which plays a critical role in growth enhancement, immune system performance, and disease resistance. To address this, various strategies have been proposed for feed management, including short-term or long-term fasting, as well as cyclic periods of fasting and refeeding to achieve compensatory growth. Another strategy involves restricting the protein content in the diet within a specific timeframe. This method focuses solely on limiting the protein content in the fish diet for a specific duration, after which the protein level is restored to an optimal and balanced level without interrupting the feeding process. Therefore, formulating diets that maximize growth while conserving protein resources, considering economic viability, and minimizing adverse environmental effects, is essential.
Material Methods: A total of 270 red tilapia, with an average initial weight of 5 ± 0.13 g were randomly distributed among 18 aquaria, each with a capacity of 100 liters (15 fish per tank). The fish were subjected to various protein-level dietary treatments over 8 weeks and were fed three times daily at 9:00, 13:00, and 16:00 until satiation. The experimental treatments were as follows; control group: feeding with a diet containing 38% optimal protein, treatment 1: feeding with a diet containing 32% protein restriction, treatment 2: feeding alternately every other day with a diet containing 32% protein restriction and a diet containing 38% protein, treatment 3: feeding alternately every week with a diet containing 32% protein restriction and a diet containing 38% protein, treatment 4: feeding a 32% protein diet for the first 3 weeks, followed by a 38% protein diet for the remaining 5 weeks, and treatment 5: feeding a 32% protein diet for the first 4 weeks, followed by a 38% protein diet for the following 4 weeks. At the end of the experiment, growth, nutritional indices, and body composition were assayed. Enzyme activity was assessed using specific substrates and diagnostic kits. Subsequently, a One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to compare the differences among the treatments, and the significance of the results was determined using Duncan's multiple-range test.
Results and discussion: The findings of this study revealed that the control group, which was fed a diet containing 38% optimal protein throughout the experimental period, achieved the highest growth performance and the best feed conversion ratio (FCR). Interestingly, treatment 4, which involved feeding the fish with a 32% protein-restricted diet for the first 3 weeks and a 38% optimal protein diet for the remaining 5 weeks, showed no significant difference in growth performance and FCR compared to the control group (P>0.05). This suggests that when refeeding with an optimal protein diet, moderate protein restriction can induce compensatory growth without negatively impacting growth performance or feed efficiency. Regarding body composition, the control group exhibited the highest protein and lowest lipid content in the carcass. However, treatment 4 showed no significant difference in these indices compared to the control group (P>0.05), indicating that the fish could maintain their body composition despite the initial protein restriction. Similarly, the lack of significant differences in moisture and ash content among the experimental groups further supports the idea that moderate protein restriction does not adversely affect the overall nutritional quality of the fish. The activity of digestive enzymes, including total protease, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and lipase, was the highest in the control group. However, treatment 4 showed no significant difference in digestive enzyme activity compared to the control group (P>0.05), suggesting that the fish were able to maintain their digestive efficiency during the refeeding period. This is a critical finding, as digestive enzyme activity is a key indicator of nutrient absorption and utilization in fish.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that moderate protein (3 weeks) restriction, when followed by adequate refeeding (5 weeks), can induce compensatory growth in red tilapia without negatively impacting growth performance, body composition, or digestive enzyme activity. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Al Ghais, S., Bhardwaj, V. 2019. Utilization of fish viscera for protease production and used for digestion of waste in the pond. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 7: 112-115.
 
Ali, M., Nicieza, A., Wootton, R.J. 2003. Compensatory growth in fishes: A response to growth depression. Fish and Fisheries 4: 147-190. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00120.x
 
 AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis (16th ed.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00120.x.
 
Asadi, M., Kenari, A.A., Esmaeili, N. 2021. Restricted-protein feeding strategy decreased the protein consumption without impairing growth performance, flesh quality and non-specific immune parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 531: 735946. DOI:  10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735946.
 
Chan, C.R., Lee, D.N., Cheng, Y.H., Hsieh, D.J.A., Weng, C.F. 2008. Feed Deprivation and re-feeding on alterations of proteases in Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Zoological Studies 47: 207-214.
 
Deck, C.A., Salger, S.A., Reynolds, H.M., Tada, M.D., Severance, M.E., Ferket, P., Egna, H.S., Fatema, M.K., Haque, S.M., Borski, R.J. 2023. Nutritional programming in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): Effect of low dietary protein on growth and the intestinal microbiome and transcriptome. PLoS ONE 18: e0292431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292431.
 
El-Sayed, A.F.M. 2006. Tilapia culture. CAB International, Wallingford, 277.  DOI: 10.1079/9780851990149.0000
 
FAO. 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. DOI: 10.4060/ca9229en.
 
Furne, M., Garcia-Gallego, M., Hidalgo, M. C., Morales, A. E., Domezain, A., Domezain, J.  Sanz, A. 2008. Effect of starvation and refeeding on digestive enzyme activities in sturgeon (Acipenser naccarii) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 149A: 420-425.  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.002.
 
Hill, B.J., Berthe, F., Lightner, D.V., Sais, R.E. 2013. Methods for disinfection of aquaculture establishments. In: Manual of diagnostic tests for aquatic animals. Office International des Epizooties Publishing, 28-39.
 
Hummel, B.C.W. 1959. A modified spectrophotometric determination of chymotrypsin, trypsin, and thrombin. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 1393-1399.
 
 Imani, A., Yazdanparast, R., Farhangi, M., Bakhtiari, M., Mojazi Amiri, B., Shokooh Saljooghi, Z. 2010. Investigation of digestive enzyme activities in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during periods of food deprivation and refeeding. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 8: 24-33. (In Persian).
 
Jain, A., Mary, A., Ramakrishnan, A.R. 2024. Protease activity in Labeo rohita fingerlings fed Lactobacillus acidophilus and Spirulina platensis, Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 24: 10-15.
 
Kaushik, S.J., Seiliez, I. 2010. Protein and amino acid nutrition and metabolism in fish: Current knowledge and future needs. Aquaculture Research 41: 322-332 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02174.x.
 
Kildea, M.A., Allan, G.L., Kearney, R.E. 2004. Accumulation and clearance of the anaesthetics clove oil and AQUI-S™ from the edible tissue of silver perch (Bidyanus bidyanus). Aquaculture 232: 265-277.  DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00483-6.
 
Li, X., Zheng, S., Wu, G. 2018. Nutrition and functions of amino acids in fish. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1265: 133-168. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-54462-1_8.
National Research Council (NRC). 2011. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. National Academies Press. DOI:  10.17226/13039.
 
Sanchooli, H., Oraji, H., Keramat, A., Jani Khalili, K. 2017. Effects of different protein restriction and realimentation on growth performance and body composition of fingerling Common Carp (Cyprinus Carpio). Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal 26: 111-120. (In Persian).
 
Sevgili, H., Hoşsu, B., Emre, Y.  Kanyılmaz, M., 2012. Compensatory growth after various levels of dietary protein restriction in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 344: 126-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.03.030.
 
Sharif-Kanani, H., Keyvanshokooh, S., Mohammadiazarm, H., Pasha-Zanoosi, H., Rezaei, S. 2024. Nano-selenium (nano-Se) removes the detrimental impacts of plant-based diets on the production performance and well-being of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture Reports 36: 102107. DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2024.102107.
 
Smith, K., Watson, A.W., Lonnie, M., Peeters, W.M., Oonincx, D., Tsoutsoura, N., Simon-Miquel, G., Szepe, K., Cochetel, N., Pearson, A.G., Witard, O.C., 2024. Meeting the global protein supply requirements of a growing and ageing population. European Journal of Nutrition 63: 1425-1433. DOI:  10.1007/s00394-024-03358-2.
 
Tacon, A.G.J., Metian, M. 2015. Feed matters: Satisfying the feed demand of aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture 23: 1-10. DOI:  10.1080/23308249.2014.987209.
 
Wang, Y., Cui, Y., Yang, Y., Cai, F. 2000. Compensatory growth in hybrid tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus × O. niloticus, reared in seawater. Aquaculture 189: 101-108.  DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00353-7.
 
Worthington, C.C. 1991. Worthington Enzyme Manual. 3rd Edition. Worthington Biochemical Corp. Freehold, New Jersey. 782p.
 
Yazdi, N., Zakeri, M., Kochanian, P., Mousavi, S.M., Taghavi Moghadam, A. 2022. Effects of starvation and re-feeding on recovery of digestive enzyme capacity in Sobeity (Sparidentex hasta) marine fish. Journal of Fisheries 75: 535-548. (In Persian).
 
Zaefarian, A., Yeganeh, S., Ouraji, H. 2020. The Effects of starvation and refeeding on growth and digestive enzymes activity in Caspian brown trout (Salmo caspius Kessler, 1877) fingerlings. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences 19: 1111-1129.
 
Zhao, W., Luo, H., Zhu, W., Yuan, X., Shao, J. 2021. Effects of time-dependent protein restriction on growth performance, digestibility, and mTOR signaling pathways in juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Frontiers in Physiology 12: 661107. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.661107.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics